Objective evaluation of anterior knee laxity; comparison of the KT-1000 and GNRB® arthrometers
There are no translations available.

Michel Collette • Julie Courville • Marc Forton • Bertrand Gagnière - 29 December 2011

Abstract

Purpose Accurate measurement of laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is usually performed with the KT-1000 arthrometer, and reproducibility and reliability are discussed. A new arthrometer, the GNRB®, has
been recently developed in an attempt to improve intraand inter-examiner reproducibility. The aim of this diagnostic study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of the GNRB® and the KT-1000. Methods Three protocols were designed to evaluate and compare the two arthrometers. Fifteen physiotherapists conducted tests on 15 subjects with healthy knees. The intra- and inter-reproducibility of the two tests were compared by analysis of variance and the F-test. Results Measure reproducibility was significantly worst with the KT-1000 than with the GNRB® (machine effect, P\0.001) regardless of operator experience. There was no significant difference between experienced and inexperienced examiners with the GNRB® (no ‘examiners effect’). Regardless of the machine, there was a ‘side effect’ with healthy knees. Conclusion This clinical study demonstrates the superior intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of the GNRB® over the KT-1000. There appears to be some technological
advantages to using the GNRB® including pressure control of the patella, accuracy of the displacement transducer, control of the load on the calf, and control of hamstring activity.

To read  complete article to download PDF click here

 
Communication à la Société Française d’Arthroscopie, Paris 2011, par Nicolas Lefèvre

 

Diese Übersetzung ist nur auf fransözisch verfügbar.

 

Weiterlesen...
 
ESSKA meeting, Oslo 8-12 Juni 2010

 

Diese Übersetzung ist nur auf fransözisch verfügbar.

Weiterlesen...
 
What confirmation for clinical diagnosis of ACL tears?

 


What confirmation for clinical diagnosis of ACL tears?

Dr MH Binet

 

Knee ACL tears are a common ski injury. The first diagnosis is made by the hand of the physician. More experienced is the practitioner, more ACL tears are clinically found out. But with the increasing numbers of old injuries, of partial tears of the ACL, of associated lesions, the diagnosis is not always clear after the clinical tests.

The other exams currently made in the emergency rooms are X Rays. We know that the radiography do not bring often useful information except the classic “Segond’s fracture”. The gold standard is the MRI which is not available in the medical centres of the ski resorts.

A new device called Genou Rob is presented. This machine is able to measure the tibial plateau movement when applied different loads. The mobility is measured in mm comparatively to the non-injured knee. When the difference between the curves is larger than 2.8 mm and when the curves inclination is different, the ACL is supposed to be torn; when the difference is larger than 2 mm and if the curves inclination is not different, the ACL is supposed to be partially torn.

 

Weiterlesen...
 
Neues System um die Schlaffhei zu messen, das GNRB



download PDF
 
Objektive Analyse von der Schlaffheit des VKB

 

Diese Übersetzung ist nur auf fransözisch verfügbar.

 

Weiterlesen...
 
POSTER SOO - Juni 2008

 

Diese Übersetzung ist nur auf fransözisch verfügbar.

 

Weiterlesen...
 
Surgetica Kongress - Grenoble - September der 21. 2007

 

Diese Übersetzung ist nur auf fransözisch verfügbar.

 

Weiterlesen...
 
SOO Kongress Tours Juni 2007

 

Diese Übersetzung ist nur auf fransözisch verfügbar.

 

Weiterlesen...